The Digital Migration of Online Communities

Migration, image courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Migration image courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Online communities are tenuous things. In the text-only olden days of the Internet, they were all in the same neighborhood — a collection of topical “newsgroups” on a distributed platform called Usenet. To be “on the Internet” in those days usually meant that one participated in — or at least read — some of these groups. They were organized hierarchically, with big-endian dotted names like rec.sports.soccer or alt.folklore.urban.  People who were “Internet famous” were known from their Usenet personae. Of course, the Internet was much smaller then; I remember when the “nn” newsreader broke, as one day there were noticeably more than the 255 groups it could list at one time.

Usenet’s Digital Diaspora

Usenet declined in the late ’90s. Since those days, there have been many cycles of boom and bust for online communities (remember MySpace? Orkut? GeoCities?).  Once the Web exploded, there was a sort of digital diaspora of the denizens of Usenet, along with the growing Internet population. Some people went to where some sets of their old friends gathered, or to where their interests took them. Two sets of my friends — old pals from college and online friends who fled Usenet — gathered on Livejournal, which was one of the most popular blogging sites in the early 2000s. Since I knew people there, that became where I did my online socializing. Then Facebook came along, and slowly but inevitably sucked up almost everyone. Like many of my compatriots, I used both platforms for a while, but almost everyone found themselves visiting Livejournal less and less as they did all their interacting on Facebook.

Suddenly, nearly everybody was in the same place again. Unlike the newsgroups of old, though, Facebook is homogenous. People write fewer words, but post more pictures. (Interestingly, a lexical shift took place with the online sense of the word “meme,” which in the Livejournal community was used to refer to what now is commonly called a “Facebook Quiz,” but now represents a semi-standard set of images with text on them.) If you use the service, or read about it online, I probably don’t have to remind you of the various worries of its users, particularly when it comes to privacy, ownership of content, and the like.  Facebook’s users have never been truly happy with the service, it seems to me — but nevertheless, it’s the place where one’s people are.

Alternative Social Networking Spaces: Ello and One Post Wonder

Lately, I’ve been looking at a few other social networking platforms.  The word on the street is that Ello has a lot of potential. (Wired called it a “Facebook Killer,” albeit in quotes.)   The upstart service is in beta, invite-only mode and isn’t very feature rich. Its design is minimalist and its ethos is populist: The company is organized as a “benefit corporation” under a charter that, ostensibly, prevents its current and any future operators from profiting by data-mining its user base, and promises to remain ad-free. Explicating its stance is its manifesto, which reads:

Your social network is owned by advertisers.

Every post you share, every friend you make, and every link you follow is tracked, recorded, and converted into data. Advertisers buy your data so they can show you more ads. You are the product that’s bought and sold.

We believe there is a better way. We believe in audacity. We believe in beauty, simplicity, and transparency. We believe that the people who make things and the people who use them should be in partnership.

We believe a social network can be a tool for empowerment. Not a tool to deceive, coerce, and manipulate — but a place to connect, create, and celebrate life.

You are not a product.

While Ello defines itself as being against ubiquitous user data farming, another beta-stage social network I’ve scored an invitation to recently is called One Post Wonder. OPW was created, at least in part, as a reaction to the amount of noise social networks tend to generate. Community tools like Facebook and Twitter are geared to encourage users to post many small things (one thought, one picture, one link, etc), which leads to the sort of “look at what I had for breakfast!” posts present on every feed. To encourage its users to reach for a little more depth and substance, OPW offers a straightforward technical solution: Users can only post once a day. Not only does this present a problem of self-moderation for those blessed souls who encounter inspiration more than once a day, but also subtly encourages conversation, since replies to posts (and replies) are unlimited.

Ultimately, You Have to Go Where Your People Are

I’ve enjoyed playing with these community applications, but as you can probably guess, my enjoyment is limited by their populations. I know a few people on both sites, but still few enough that I can read the day’s output on both in about ten minutes (Whereas Facebook is a never-ending wave of stuff). But it’s been enough to get me wondering if these kinds of new services — and the chatter about them — is the leading edge of another Internet diaspora. Google+ never seemed to hit a solid tipping point, but there are certainly people there. Undergraduates and their immediate elders largely eschew Facebook in favor of Tumblr and mobile-only apps like YikYak.

And of course, the Internet is vast, so I’m only looking at this through the lens of my connections to the people I follow on the services I know about. But I can certainly see a time when enough people trickle away from Facebook that it’s no longer the behemoth it is now.

Our Top Two Blackboard Gradebook Questions, Answered!

Even if you're not teaching students about breakfast, you will still have to figure out how to best use Blackboard's Gradebook feature. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Students might worry about exams, but for professors the real problems come when it’s time to calculate and turn in final grades. While Blackboard can help, it can also cause confusion. Here are answers to two of the most common questions bbhelp@wm.edu receives this time of year: How Do I Turn in Final Grades? Final [...]

Continue reading...

Video Conferencing and Collaboration at W&M: A Follow Up

IMG_0230

A little more than a year ago, I wrote a post about the history of, the many uses for, and the potential good that video conferencing and collaboration can produce in the academic environment. Shortly there after, my good friend and colleague, John Drummond, published a post about many of the technology solutions we have [...]

Continue reading...

Student Perspectives on W&M’s First Online Courses

Online Pilot 1

This summer Randy Coleman (biochemstry) and Till Schreiber (macroeconomics) taught William & Mary’s first fully online summer courses in the Arts & Sciences. Once the courses were completed and grades were posted, we sent out a student satisfaction survey to all 22 students who completed the courses. We had twelve students complete the survey (a [...]

Continue reading...

The King Is Dead? Long Live the King? The Rise and Possible Fall of the Personal Computer, and What It Means to Academia

Will the personal computer soon become obsolete? Image courtesy of a Creative Commons license via Flickr user Niv Singer.

For at least a couple of years now there’s been quite a buzz about the impending death of the personal computer (for the purposes of this article, the PC, and not to be confused with the more tightly defined Microsoft-based PC). Much of this discussion has been based on the dismal sales trends for PCs [...]

Continue reading...

Reflections on a Fireside Chat: “Managing” Versus “Teaching” the Online Course

campfire

This past weekend, I had an interesting conversation about e-learning while sitting on a mountaintop, huddled around a campfire in the dark. (I promise, dear reader, that I won’t try to make a metaphor out of that.) I was having this conversation with an old friend from my undergraduate days who teaches history at a [...]

Continue reading...

7 Tips for Giving Tests in Blackboard

W&M’s Blackboard system is available 99.98% of the time. While that’s a comforting statistic, it doesn’t help when you’ve scheduled a critical test and the system experiences issues. Thankfully, there are a few things you can do to make sure Blackboard tests go smoothly. 1. Give a Practice Test This will ensure that your students [...]

Continue reading...

Opening up the Web for Students and Faculty

Domain

Last fall, our neighbors just two and a half hours to the north at the University of Mary Washington launched an eye-opening program for their students, faculty, and staff. It is a service to allow users to register an Internet domain and house it on internal servers, called A Domain of One’s Own. The name [...]

Continue reading...

Sorting out Your Dissertation’s Electronic Publishing Options

dissertation-pile

Not so long ago I defended my doctoral dissertation (hooray!) and readied copies of my manuscript for the College. I had reviewed the requirements the few weeks prior to preparing my manuscript so that I could be ready to turn it in soon after I defended. I went to turn in my copies the morning [...]

Continue reading...

Me and My Google: Why I Can’t Walk Away from This Relationship

oblio_arrow

Okay, so first off, let me just say I love Google. In fact, part of my anger at Google stems from the fact that Google does so many awesome things. It tells me all the things I want to hear, it brings me flowers or chocolates (well, at least it shows me where I can [...]

Continue reading...